[header]
weblog photography photoblog contact site map
Login Login

Register

[About me] About the author
[Me]

Geek and nerd Joe D has in the past studied genetics, molecular and cell biology, worked in cancer research, and made contemptuous amounts of money from incompetently composed photographs. The views expressed on this weblog are not his own; rather, he stole them from you through mind invasion.

more...

RSS feeds Syndicate

Subscribe to the weblog:

RSS 2.0 Atom

Add to Google Subscribe with Bloglines

Subscribe to the photoblog:

RSS Atom

Add to Google Subscribe with Bloglines

List of RSS feeds

Creationism: not such a big deal in the UK after all

For eight years, the United States was the brawling village idiot of the developed world, so far as Europe seemed to be concerned. But in Britain, we are constantly reminded that, in addition to our own peculiar intellectual failures, we are not immune to catching the American anti-reality bugs. Everyone's favourite example is creationism. Over the past couple of years we've had the confusingly named Truth In Science sending creationist DVDs to teachers; dense dentistry students getting in the news for protesting Steve Jones' lectures; Ken Ham preaching in Westminster; and most shockingly, living national treasure Sir David Attenborough getting sent hate mail from them. And then this week, Christian think-tank Theos press-released another creationism-evolution survey, and all of the newspapers dutifully ran headlines announcing that only a quarter of Britons accept evolution.

If you've heard the "creationists are invading" warning repeated enough times, you might not even notice just how ridiculous some of this stuff is. Sure, American fundamentalists bought enough creation museum tickets to pay for Ken Ham to go on a jolly to London. Sure, a few individual halfwits will complain about their sensibilities having been offended, and get a lazy journalist to believe that it is news. Sure, there are even a small number of people in this country so tragically disturbed that they feel they must threaten one of our greatest heroes. There are even a couple of organisations with rich enough benefactors that they can waste the world's precious resources sending junk mail to science teachers. But to the extent that three out of four Britons are out of touch with reality to the extent of six orders of magnitude?[1] I can't believe that's true. And it's not.

Do you remember the story in December 2007, about the creationist theme park being built in Lancashire? The blogosphere was aghast at how low the UK had sunk. Anyone actually visited the theme park yet? Oh, no, because it still doesn't exist. The AH Trust, the charity behind the initiative, have a amusing professional-looking website to tell you all about their plans, though. Apparently the £3.5 million aircraft-hanger exhibit will be the "World’s [sic] first 3D Cinematic Hologram Theme Park." According to their annual report and accounts, the AH Trust consists of an engineer (always with the engineers!), his wife, and their two mates. They have just over 100 grand in the bank. Not being an accountant, I have no idea why all except £461 of that is currently just resting in the donors' own bank accounts. The chances of such a theme park being constructed are nil, but somehow I feel that the AH Trust has served its purpose, with newspapers and bloggers doing their bit by humouring them.

While creationism in the UK is clearly a problem which needs tackling, I think it is clear that the problem is consistently overblown. To the lazy hack journalist, creation vs evolution sounds like a fundamental issue in culture, society, science and philosophy, that is of some great importance. So any crackpot and his mates down the pub church can say something retarded and get a he-said-she-said write up in the rags. And bloggers everywhere will hail it as another sign of the rise of creationism, and the descent of the UK into an irrational non-reality based world. We all seem so good at spotting, and correcting, the nonsense newspapers write about science. So why is the skepticism not applied a little more widely?

Footnotes

  1. ^  Roughly the difference between the age of the universe, and the age creationists think the universe is. As Dawkins says "that's a non-trivial error."

[Edit] Edit | [Delete] Delete | [History] History | [Version] Last edited by Joe D, 2009-02-08 00:54:53 | [Views] Viewed 9606 times | [del.icio.us] [Digg thins] [Reddit] [Magnolia] [Spurl] [Searchles]


If you've written something relevant to this page elsewhere on the web you can notify readers of this page with a trackback. If you have a weblog, chances are your software has an easy built in way to send trackbacks. If your software doesn't let you send trackbacks, this technical specification may help. And if that sounds too much like hard work, just leave a comment!

Send trackbacks to http://www.cotch.net/trackbacks.php?ns=blog&fn=20090208_0054

Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:

Wikicode:

  • Links: [[page]] or [[namespace:pagename|link title]]
  • External links: [[http://www.example.com|link title]]
  • Start a new line with an * or a # to make a list.

Tim

[flag] Universe

That AH Trust website is amazing. They not only have a vision of a Christian Theme Park (please let them have a merry-go-round where you can ride on Jesus, that would be the best) but also run an advertising agency, film studio and day care centre for dementia sufferers. Well no one could accuse them of having narrow interests.

I know the funding graph on your blog is looking a bit sorry but, AH Trust, if you build it I will come.

Posted at 2009-02-08 16:42:59 - [Del]

Andrew Clegg

http://biotext.org.uk/

A few days late, while I catch up my blog backlog, but well said.

Incidentally, the AH Trust website for me just gives some half-loaded holding page, like someone couldn't afford their domain bills...

Posted at 2009-02-13 11:53:46 - [Ban] - [Del]


Creative Commons License Best Viewed With Any Browser! Valid HTML 4.0 Valid CSS Powered by Apache Powered by PHP Powered by mySQL

All text on this site is © Joe D 2001-08, except where stated, see this page for conditions of use.

Google PageRank Checker - Page Rank Calculator

0.094713926315308 secs