[header]
weblog photography photoblog contact site map
Login Login

Register

[About me] About the author
[Me]

Geek and nerd Joe Dunckley has in the past studied genetics, molecular and cell biology, worked in cancer research, and made contemptuous amounts of money from incompetently composed photographs. He now gets paid to sit at a desk laughing at the work of real scientists. The views expressed on this weblog are not his own; rather, he stole them from you through mind invasion.

more...

RSS feeds Syndicate

Subscribe to the weblog:

RSS 2.0 Atom

Add to Google Subscribe with Bloglines

Subscribe to the photoblog:

RSS Atom

Add to Google Subscribe with Bloglines

List of RSS feeds

What skepticism is

I was watching the TANK vodcast the other day. They had a short feature: "what is skepticism?" It had a series of vox pops shot in Sydney. People told us what they think skepticism is. It's all about being stubborn, close minded and refusing to believe the things that everybody else believes, apparently. The programme makers didn't answer the question themselves -- after all, "you and I know what it is". Well, I do know what skepticism is, but how would I explain it to those who don't? Skepbitch has managed to get in with an answer before me, but I'd like to add my own way of describing what it means to be a skeptic.

Skepticism is the opposite of naivety. Being a skeptic means being aware of all of the ways you can be deceived. It means knowing the methods that other people use to deceive you -- the propaganda and rhetoric techniques, and the fallacies in their own thinking. It means knowing the limitations of your senses, and designing ways to get around those limitations. And it means knowing the appropriate volume of evidence to demand for claims about the world. A skeptic does not have a closed mind, but their mind is not a free-for-all. Skepticism is the doorman who checks for fraudsters.

When I was very young, ghosts were fashionable in the UK. I loved the ghost stories on television -- Fortean TV on Channel 4, and an ITV programme whose name I forget, hosted by a man with large dusty book and a candle. Though the stories were transparent fiction, the ten year-old me believed them. He was naive. He got fooled, and one can chuckle at his expense. If more people realised that the antonym of "skeptical" is "naive", they might be a little less inclined to use it as a derogatory term. There is nothing to celebrate about being gullible and exploitable.


[Edit] Edit | [Delete] Delete | [History] History | [Version] Last edited by Joe Dunckley, 2008-02-06 22:36:45 | [Views] Viewed 38660 times | [del.icio.us] [Digg thins] [Reddit] [Magnolia] [Spurl] [Searchles]


If you've written something relevant to this page elsewhere on the web you can notify readers of this page with a trackback. If you have a weblog, chances are your software has an easy built in way to send trackbacks. If your software doesn't let you send trackbacks, this technical specification may help. And if that sounds too much like hard work, just leave a comment!

Send trackbacks to http://www.cotch.net/trackbacks.php?ns=blog&fn=20080206_2235

Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:

Wikicode:

  • Links: [[page]] or [[namespace:pagename|link title]]
  • External links: [[http://www.example.com|link title]]
  • Start a new line with an * or a # to make a list.

Creative Commons License Best Viewed With Any Browser! Valid HTML 4.0 Valid CSS Powered by Apache Powered by PHP Powered by mySQL

All text on this site is © Joe Dunckley 2001-08, except where stated, see this page for conditions of use.

Google PageRank Checker - Page Rank Calculator

0.29915118217468 secs